Abortion and Hitler

Cardinal Egan, Archbishop of New York, has written an excellent article on why abortion is completely wrong, in which he compares abortion to the eugenics practised by the Nazis. You can view it here. A few excerpts:

The picture on this page is an untouched photograph of a being that has been within its mother for 20 weeks. Please do me the favor of looking at it carefully.

Have you any doubt that it is a human being?

If you do not have any such doubt, have you any doubt that it is an innocent human being?

If you have no doubt about this either, have you any doubt that the authorities in a civilized society are duty-bound to protect this innocent human being if anyone were to wish to kill it?

Why do I not get into defining “human being,” defining “person,” defining “living,” and the rest? Because, I respond, I am sound of mind and endowed with a fine set of eyes, into which I do not believe it is well to cast sand. I looked at the photograph, and I have no doubt about what I saw and what are the duties of a civilized society if what I saw is in danger of being killed by someone who wishes to kill it or, if you prefer, someone who “chooses” to kill it. In brief: I looked, and I know what I saw.

Adolf Hitler convinced himself and his subjects that Jews and homosexuals were other than human beings. Joseph Stalin did the same as regards Cossacks and Russian aristocrats. And this despite the fact that Hitler and his subjects had seen both Jews and homosexuals with their own eyes, and Stalin and his subjects had seen both Cossacks and Russian aristocrats with theirs. Happily, there are few today who would hesitate to condemn in the roundest terms the self-deceit of Hitler, Stalin or even their subjects to the extent that the subjects could have done something to end the madness and protect living, innocent human beings.

It is high time to stop pretending that we do not know what this nation of ours is allowing—and approving—with the killing each year of more than 1,600,000 innocent human beings within their mothers. We know full well that to kill what is clearly seen to be an innocent human being or what cannot be proved to be other than an innocent human being is as wrong as wrong gets.

A new test is just being trialed in the UK which allows even more detailed analysis of the genetics of a baby before they are born. Note this:

Technically, it would be possible to use the test to select an embryo with a particular eye colour or to screen for multiple genes known to affect height or weight.

The whole thing works on allowing you to select the child you want (based on health initially, but potentially you can select for pretty well anything), and kill the rest. This is blatant eugenics, just like Hitler was using. The only difference is that if you kill them before they are born, you don’t have to listen to them scream.

Hat tip: Being Frank

4 Responses to “Abortion and Hitler”

  1. Paul Says:

    Sam, you need to read your Bible a bit more mate. Numbers 5:12-28 gives any reader who feels so inclined, a recipe for an abortion drug called ‘Bitter Water’, and strict procedures how to administer it. And I thought you Christian types were pro-life? Guess that was my mistake.
    Cheers. Paul (for more details press my name)

  2. Mr Dennis Says:

    If anyone else cares to read that reference, they will find the “bitter water” is a mixture of water and dust – hardly likely to naturally cause abortion any more than eating dusty sandwiches would. The point is that God would judge supernaturally, and if the woman was innocent of the crime (adultery) then she would be fine, and if she was guilty she would become grievously ill. Although abortion is not mentioned, based on the description she is likely to lose the child if she happened to be carrying one at the time, along with becoming ill herself. Just as if a woman were stoned according to the old Jewish laws she would also lose the baby. The point of this whole ordeal is to punish the woman for adultery.

    In summary, this passage makes no mention of abortion and doesn’t even make mention of the woman being pregnant (although that would of course be one potential way of the husband guessing she had been sleeping around). Besides, these Jewish punishments are not used by Christians.

    Paul is clutching at straws. Christians are to protect the helpless, and who is more helpless than the unborn child?

  3. Mr Dennis Says:

    By the way, for readers interested in the Jewish laws, if you read Exodus 21:22 you will find that abortion was always considered a crime, and the offender had to pay the woman’s husband whatever he demanded as compensation.

  4. The morality of abortion « Samuel Dennis - Family Party candidate for Selwyn Says:

    […] it is back. Increasingly, genetic tests are available that will allow you to determine all sorts of things about a child in the womb. At present you can […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: